Scajola do not know if he is guilty of something or if it is yet another intended victim of the usual media pillory.
The story, by the way is unclear and Scajola was not even under investigation. But there is a rather strange thing that should be explained, but first things first.
will first say that there is to buy an apartment at a price just is not a crime. Maybe it was all that flat to be restored and its value was low for that reason, he or Scajola really a bargain, if more shocked that I congratulate the former Minister.
Nor is it a crime to buy a property or with the help of people sentenced by the judiciary. If not we should ask for a certificate of pending proceedings to the grocery store that sells a pound of bologna. Also is not a crime if someone offers to pay us a part or the whole house (ah, I had a benefactor like that)!
As the same way you do not configure a crime if the person who sold the apartment has won tenders for public works: it is logical for companies or people have very large hands-on throughout the building. But the important thing is that you establish a relationship of connection quid pro quo for which personal favors in exchange for being awarded a contract, which does not seem to be blown out.
Well, so far I think the normal case. The
rather unclear what is another: is it possible that a person does not know if his house was bought entirely by him or by others? Well, to me it seems incredible how it seems to me absurd that Scajola has instructed his lawyers to investigate this hypothesis. Of course if one does not even know who paid for the house in which we live is close to joke.
Scajola also says that in the event that lawyers confirm this, he would cancel the contract to buy and which would in this case? Sold it to former owners? The give away? To me this statement seems evident absurdity.
We will see developments but need to register once again that a political figure even after the facts of alleged corruption is forced to resign.
the face of the presumption of innocence!
The story, by the way is unclear and Scajola was not even under investigation. But there is a rather strange thing that should be explained, but first things first.
will first say that there is to buy an apartment at a price just is not a crime. Maybe it was all that flat to be restored and its value was low for that reason, he or Scajola really a bargain, if more shocked that I congratulate the former Minister.
Nor is it a crime to buy a property or with the help of people sentenced by the judiciary. If not we should ask for a certificate of pending proceedings to the grocery store that sells a pound of bologna. Also is not a crime if someone offers to pay us a part or the whole house (ah, I had a benefactor like that)!
As the same way you do not configure a crime if the person who sold the apartment has won tenders for public works: it is logical for companies or people have very large hands-on throughout the building. But the important thing is that you establish a relationship of connection quid pro quo for which personal favors in exchange for being awarded a contract, which does not seem to be blown out.
Well, so far I think the normal case. The
rather unclear what is another: is it possible that a person does not know if his house was bought entirely by him or by others? Well, to me it seems incredible how it seems to me absurd that Scajola has instructed his lawyers to investigate this hypothesis. Of course if one does not even know who paid for the house in which we live is close to joke.
Scajola also says that in the event that lawyers confirm this, he would cancel the contract to buy and which would in this case? Sold it to former owners? The give away? To me this statement seems evident absurdity.
We will see developments but need to register once again that a political figure even after the facts of alleged corruption is forced to resign.
the face of the presumption of innocence!
0 comments:
Post a Comment